<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Vann bites the dust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tommickx.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/another-vann-bites-the-dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tommickx.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/another-vann-bites-the-dust/</link>
	<description>Tommickx in Cambodia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sok</title>
		<link>http://tommickx.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/another-vann-bites-the-dust/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Sok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommickx.wordpress.com/?p=366#comment-706</guid>
		<description>I am so happy to read some time the article that concerned about Modern Cambodian Architecture such as Council of Ministers. I would like to give some comment as well on the sentences above...

(If it doesn’t look like Angkor Wat it’s not Cambodian. Colonial heritage however IS worth saving, because tourists like it and therefore it generates money.)

this particular sentences are rather need to be reconsider whether they are the RIGHT sentences to mention in here...? Any buildings from the history of CAMBODIA need to be preserved.... Not ONLY the Angkorian temples neither Modern Cambodian Buildings, but the Colonials Buildings as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so happy to read some time the article that concerned about Modern Cambodian Architecture such as Council of Ministers. I would like to give some comment as well on the sentences above&#8230;</p>
<p>(If it doesn’t look like Angkor Wat it’s not Cambodian. Colonial heritage however IS worth saving, because tourists like it and therefore it generates money.)</p>
<p>this particular sentences are rather need to be reconsider whether they are the RIGHT sentences to mention in here&#8230;? Any buildings from the history of CAMBODIA need to be preserved&#8230;. Not ONLY the Angkorian temples neither Modern Cambodian Buildings, but the Colonials Buildings as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cambodia: rumours on the interwebs &#171; Details are Sketchy</title>
		<link>http://tommickx.wordpress.com/2008/02/11/another-vann-bites-the-dust/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Cambodia: rumours on the interwebs &#171; Details are Sketchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tommickx.wordpress.com/?p=366#comment-521</guid>
		<description>[...] Council of Ministers latest victim of run-away evictions [Phnom Tom]     Posted by DAS Filed in Cambodia, Uncategorized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Council of Ministers latest victim of run-away evictions [Phnom Tom]     Posted by DAS Filed in Cambodia, Uncategorized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
